The UREVO SpaceWalk E1L and E4W look like two versions of the same basic idea: slim, flat walking pads designed for under-desk use and horizontal storage.
But they’re not interchangeable.
The E1L is shorter, lighter, lower, currently available from UREVO and Amazon US, and much easier to recommend as an everyday compact walking pad.
The E4W gives you a noticeably longer walking belt and a more furniture-friendly wood-look design, but it also takes up more floor space, weighs more, and is currently sold out on UREVO’s US site. No current Amazon US listing could be verified during our research.
Quick answer: For most buyers, we’d choose the UREVO SpaceWalk E1L. It is about 5.1 inches shorter, 4.2 pounds lighter, 0.7 inches lower, and currently much easier to buy. The E4W only makes more sense if its roughly 4.4-inch-longer walking belt or wood-look design matters enough to outweigh the extra size and limited availability.
Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
How we compared them: We have not personally tested these two walking pads. This comparison is based on current UREVO product pages, official manuals, Amazon US availability, published specifications, and original calculations derived from those measurements. Prices, stock status, and return terms were checked on September 17, 2026 and may change.
UREVO SpaceWalk E1L vs E4W at a Glance
| UREVO SpaceWalk E1L | UREVO SpaceWalk E4W | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Smaller rooms, easier daily storage | Longer walking belt |
| Current UREVO status | In stock | Sold out |
| Listed price | $139.99 | $269.99 listed, but unavailable |
| Dimensions | 42.1 × 19.3 × 4.2 in | 47.2 × 18.9 × 4.9 in* |
| Walking area | 35.43 × 15 in | 39.8 × 15 in* |
| Weight | 36.59 lb | 40.8 lb |
| Weight capacity | 265 lb | 265 lb |
| Top speed | 4 mph | 4 mph |
| Incline | No | No |
| App support | Yes | Yes |
| Remote | Yes | Yes |
| Storage | Flat / horizontal | Flat / horizontal |
*UREVO’s E4W marketing materials contain some conflicting dimensions. We use the official manual / Tech Specs values here: 47.2 × 18.9 × 4.9 inches and a 39.8 × 15-inch walking area.
The E1L Is the Better Choice for Small Rooms
This is the biggest practical difference.
The E1L measures 42.1 × 19.3 inches, while the E4W measures 47.2 × 18.9 inches using the official manual dimensions.
The E4W is slightly narrower, but it is also 5.1 inches longer.
That extra length matters more than the tiny width advantage in a compact room.
Using the published dimensions, the total floor footprint works out to approximately:
- E1L: 812.53 sq in / 5.64 sq ft
- E4W: 892.08 sq in / 6.19 sq ft
So the E1L takes up about 8.9% less floor area overall.
That is a much more useful way to think about “compact” than simply comparing one dimension.
Small-room winner: UREVO SpaceWalk E1L
The E1L Is Also Easier to Store Under Furniture
Neither model folds.
Both are designed to roll into storage horizontally, and both official manuals prohibit upright or side storage.
That makes overall height especially important if you’re planning to slide one under a bed or sofa.
The E1L is 4.2 inches high.
The E4W is 4.9 inches high according to the official manual and Tech Specs.
That difference sounds small, but under low furniture, 0.7 inches can be the difference between fitting and not fitting.
Using the published dimensions as a simple rectangular storage envelope, we calculated:
- E1L: about 1.98 cu ft
- E4W: about 2.53 cu ft
That means the E1L’s overall storage envelope is about 22% smaller, or put another way, the E4W’s is roughly 28% larger.
One important caveat: don’t measure your furniture opening at exactly 4.2 inches and assume the E1L will slide in.
You still need clearance for floor irregularities, rugs, furniture frames, and rolling movement.
Furniture-storage winner: UREVO SpaceWalk E1L
The E4W Gives You More Room to Walk
This is the clearest argument for the E4W.
Its walking area is approximately 39.8 × 15 inches according to the official manual.
The E1L gives you 35.43 × 15 inches.
So the E4W adds roughly 4.37 inches of walking length, while belt width remains exactly the same.
That is around 12.3% more walking area.
For users with a naturally longer stride, that extra front-to-back room may feel more comfortable.
But we would not turn that into a blanket claim that the E4W is “better for tall users.”
UREVO does not publish a recommended user height or maximum stride length for either model.
The safer conclusion is simply:
The E4W gives you more front-to-back room for longer strides.
Not:
The E4W is guaranteed to be more comfortable for tall users.
That’s an important distinction.
Walking-area winner: UREVO SpaceWalk E4W
Need more room for a longer stride? See our guide to the best walking pads for tall users.
Belt-to-Body Efficiency: The E4W Uses Its Extra Size Well
Here’s where the comparison gets more interesting.
The E4W is larger overall.
But most of that extra size is being used to give you a larger walking area.
Using the published measurements:
- E1L walking area: 531.45 sq in
- E1L total footprint: 812.53 sq in
- Belt-to-body efficiency: about 65.4%
For the E4W:
- E4W walking area: about 597 sq in
- E4W total footprint: 892.08 sq in
- Belt-to-body efficiency: about 66.9%
So the E4W converts slightly more of its footprint into usable walking surface.
The difference is only about 1.5 percentage points, but it tells us something useful:
The E1L is more compact overall. The E4W makes slightly better use of the extra space it occupies.
That’s a much more balanced way to compare them than saying one is simply “smaller” and therefore better.
The E1L Is Easier to Move Every Day
The E1L weighs 36.59 pounds.
The E4W weighs 40.8 pounds.
That’s a difference of about 4.21 pounds, making the E4W roughly 11.5% heavier.
Both models have transport rollers, so you probably won’t feel the full weight difference while rolling them across a flat floor.
But walking pads rarely move in perfectly straight lines.
You may need to:
- pull one out from under a bed
- rotate it beside a desk
- move it over a floor transition
- reposition it around furniture
In those situations, lighter is usually easier.
The difference is not enormous, but combined with the E1L’s shorter body and lower height, it reinforces the same pattern.
Portability winner: UREVO SpaceWalk E1L
Speed, Capacity, and Incline Are Basically a Tie
This is important because the E4W looks like the larger, more expensive model.
But that does not translate into higher basic performance limits.
Both models have:
- a 0.6–4.0 mph speed range
- a 265-pound published weight capacity
- no incline
- Bluetooth / UREVO app support
- a remote control
So you’re not paying more for a higher top speed, more published user capacity, or incline functionality.
There is also an easy mistake to avoid here.
Some shared UREVO app marketing language can sound like the app supports incline control.
But neither the E1L nor E4W actually has an incline mechanism.
The E4W is not an incline-equipped upgrade over the E1L.
What About Motor Power?
The official manuals list:
- E1L: 478 W rated, 2.5 HP peak
- E4W: 550 W rated, 2.5 HP peak
So the E4W has higher rated electrical power.
But both still have the same 4 mph top speed and 265-pound published capacity.
That means we would not treat the wattage difference as evidence that the E4W is meaningfully “more powerful” in everyday use.
UREVO’s own E4W marketing materials also conflict with the manual, listing 2.25 HP in some places rather than 2.5 HP.
So for this buying decision, motor numbers are less useful than the physical differences you can actually measure:
- walking area
- body size
- weight
- availability
Which One Is Quieter?
We don’t think there is enough evidence to name a winner.
Neither current official product page or manual provides a standardized, verifiable dB figure for these two models.
Both use:
- five-layer belts
- eight silicone shock absorbers
- two soft rubber pads
and UREVO describes both in quiet-operation terms.
A TechRadar review described the E4W as subjectively quiet, but that’s not a controlled same-condition comparison against the E1L.
And apartment noise depends heavily on flooring, walking speed, body weight, foot strike, and whether you use an isolation mat.
So we would not write:
E1L is quieter.
or:
E4W won’t bother downstairs neighbors.
Noise winner: No call
What Does the Extra $130 Actually Buy?
This is probably the most important value question.
UREVO currently lists the E1L at $139.99.
The E4W page shows $269.99, although the model is currently sold out.
So the displayed difference is roughly $130.
What does that extra $130 actually add?
Mostly:
- 4.37 inches more belt length
- about 65.55 sq in more walking area
- wood-look styling
- 72 W higher rated motor power
What does it not add?
- higher top speed
- more weight capacity
- wider belt
- incline
- app connectivity
- remote control
If we turn the displayed price difference into a rough calculation:
- about $29.75 per extra inch of belt length
- about $1.98 per extra square inch of walking area
But those figures should not be overinterpreted.
You’re not literally buying inches by the dollar.
The useful takeaway is simpler:
The E4W’s extra cost mainly buys a longer belt and different styling, not a broader set of capabilities.
And because the E4W is currently sold out, this is really a comparison of listed prices rather than two equally available purchase options.
E1L vs E4W for Under-Desk Use
For everyday desk walking, we’d choose the E1L.
Both models top out at 4 mph and offer app and remote control.
But the E1L is:
- 5.1 inches shorter
- 4.21 pounds lighter
- 0.7 inches lower
- currently available from UREVO
- currently available on Amazon US
Amazon US also showed the E1L in stock at $143.81 during the research, with a free 30-day refund/replacement display.
For a machine you may roll under a desk every morning and put away at night, those practical differences matter more than the E4W’s longer belt for many buyers.
Under-desk winner: UREVO SpaceWalk E1L
Availability Changes This Comparison
Normally, we’d treat price and specifications as the main decision points.
Here, availability matters just as much.
At the time of research:
E1L
- in stock on UREVO US
- in stock on Amazon US
- verified Amazon listing
- current retail price available
E4W
- UREVO US page exists
- marked Sold out
- no current E4W Amazon US listing could be verified
- old candidate ASIN returns Page Not Found
UREVO has not explicitly labeled the E4W “discontinued,” so we would not call it discontinued.
But it is also absent from UREVO’s current SpaceWalk collection, while the E1L remains part of the present lineup.
That makes the E1L the much more realistic purchase today.
Who Should Buy the UREVO SpaceWalk E1L?
Choose the E1L if:
- You want a walking pad you can actually buy now.
- Floor space is limited.
- Your bed or sofa has limited clearance.
- You’ll move the machine regularly.
- You mainly want flat walking up to 4 mph.
- Amazon US availability and return options matter.
- You don’t think a longer walking belt and wood-look design justify a large price premium.
For most current buyers, this is the more practical choice.
Who Should Buy the UREVO SpaceWalk E4W?
Consider the E4W if:
- You can find legitimate current stock from UREVO or an authorized retailer.
- You want more front-to-back walking room.
- You have a longer stride.
- You prefer the wood-look design.
- The larger dimensions and extra weight are not a problem.
- You verify the retailer’s warranty and return terms before ordering.
The E4W is not inherently a bad design.
It’s simply harder to recommend in 2026 when the E1L is smaller, cheaper, currently available, and offers the same speed and published capacity.
If you do find an E4W for sale, we would avoid assuming an old Amazon listing is the correct model. The previously identified candidate ASIN currently returns Page Not Found.
Still comparing UREVO with other brands? See our WalkingPad vs UREVO comparison for small spaces.
UREVO SpaceWalk E1L vs E4W: Our Verdict
For most buyers, we’d choose the UREVO SpaceWalk E1L.
It takes up about 8.9% less floor area, has a substantially smaller storage envelope, weighs about 4.2 pounds less, sits lower to the floor, and is currently available both directly from UREVO and on Amazon US.
The E4W has one meaningful functional advantage:
more walking length.
Its roughly 40-inch belt gives you about 4.4 inches more front-to-back room than the E1L.
If that extra stride room matters to you and you can find legitimate stock, the E4W still has a reason to exist.
But its larger dimensions do not come with more speed, more capacity, incline, or a wider belt.
So the choice is simpler than the price difference suggests.
Buy the E1L for compact everyday usability.
Choose the E4W only if the longer belt or wood-look design is specifically worth the extra size and limited availability to you.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the UREVO E1L better than the E4W?
For most current buyers, yes in practical terms. The E1L is smaller, lighter, lower, cheaper, and currently available. The E4W’s main advantage is its longer walking belt.
What is the main difference between the UREVO E1L and E4W?
The E4W is about 5.1 inches longer overall and has roughly 4.4 inches more walking-belt length. The E1L is smaller and lighter, while both share a 15-inch belt width, 4 mph top speed, and 265-pound published capacity.
Does the UREVO E4W have incline?
No. Neither the E1L nor E4W has an incline mechanism.
Which one is better for a small apartment?
The E1L. Its calculated floor footprint is approximately 8.9% smaller, and it is also lower and lighter.
Which one is better for a longer stride?
The E4W provides more front-to-back room because its walking belt is about 4.37 inches longer. That does not guarantee comfort for any particular user height, but it gives more longitudinal margin.
Is the UREVO E4W discontinued?
UREVO does not currently label the E4W as discontinued. However, its official US page is sold out and it does not appear in the current SpaceWalk collection, so we would describe it as currently unavailable / possibly being phased out, not officially discontinued.
